Gigazubyte ID:015441 2008/01/20 15:16:30	Reply Edit post Homepage
I can figure that out. My excellently subtle method is called "Hey, what's your favorite kind of undies?" Note: should only be performed at a distance. Some subjects may react adversely.

Re: What if it's not a normal color, but something like fish patterned boxers?...

®Prof. NohmNohmz™ ID:017807 2008/01/20 15:29:07

Reply Edit post Homepage

Yea you can take that approach. but what i'm saying is I can make an accurate guess of several intimate details by asking simple questions about their personal life that "seemingly" has nothing to do with those things. All things are connected, and there are clues to anything you want to know about a person in their personality. It's not limited to underwear. that's just an example. You can tell what their childhood was like, can tell the things that frighten them, that turn them on, that infuriate them. And the "them" i refer to isn't limited to the female gender either. It's all about observation, and attention to detail. Although it takes longer with some people.

This is, of course, assuming that they are honest...

Gigazubyte ID:015441 2008/01/20 15:35:10	Reply Edit post Homepage
although I suppose lying tells you a fair bit about them too. Blank silence as well, I guess.

Re: This is, of course, assuming that they are honest...

®Prof. NohmNohmz™ ID:017807 2008/01/20 15:59:17	Reply Edit post Homepage
Indeed. That's a tricky aspect of it, to tell if they're lying. It's an orderly web of questions, all seemingly benign in nature, but the overall outcome would tell you if they're lying or not. Silence too, is a good tell. However it's dependant on the type of silence. you have to know if they're speachless, mildly embarassed, shamed or just angry.

Re: Everyone loves a great rumproast

Kirby ID:017099 2008/01/20 15:25:06	Reply Edit post Homepage
"Look all you want but that won't get you any closer to touching those nunies and them glutes." Sometimes some would just like to look, nothing more. Just how we would like to keep looking at a feast served to perfection instead of eating right away. Got to look at more than one perspective of the behavior sometimes...

I never understood that mode of behavior.

®Prof. NohmNohmz™ ID:017807 2008/01/20 15:38:46

Reply Edit post Homepage

As studious as I am of the human complex, I could never understand how a person could judge a "meal" on more than how it tastes and how nutritious it is. The whole "feasting with your eyes" is a luxury afforded to those who live to eat, rather than eating to live. Seems it's exclusive to western europe and the united states. Ask a kid from cambodia if he'd rather eyeball the food or eat it. For that matter ask anyone else on earth aside the afore mentioned. Sure you don't want it to look like slop, but the function of food is to be consumed.

What about food that looks good but is neither nutritious nor tasty?...

Gigazubyte ID:015441 2008/01/20 15:42:22	Reply Edit post Homepage
One can appreciate a nice figure without wanting to be intimate with the person it belongs to.

Re: What about food that looks good but is neither nutritious nor tasty?...

®Prof. NohmNohmz™ ID:017807 2008/01/20 16:05:11

Reply Edit post Homepage

Is intimacy the issue? I wasn't speaking metaphorically. Food is food. and I don't find beauty outwardly in people. One reason I don't speak to people in real life. It's easier to know people here. And as for food. . . people sate my appetite in ways other than of a sexual nature. In fact the booty is usually the farthest thing from my mind. You know how much energy people sweat out? it's a waste to leak so much energy.

I dunno, the stuff the cafeteria serves is kinda sketchy...

Gigazubyte ID:015441 2008/01/20 16:20:07

Reply Edit post Homepage

And my point was not that sexual gratification is the sole purpose for the company of others, but that it is possible to admire an aesthetically pleasing figure without wanting to partake. You wouldn't want to eat food made of wax, no matter how good it looked, but you could still say "That's a fine sculpture of food right there." Of course, finding someone to converse with is no easy task. I've only found one person who thinks enough like me that we're able to really understand each other, but differently enough that each viewpoint adds to the other and allows us to reach new points we never could have found unaided. Which is not to say I don't enjoy talking to all of my friends, but often they have no clue what I'm saying. And of course, disagreeing on fundamental principals, while interesting, tends to lead one into the same never ending debates over and over, which gets tiresome.

We could agree to disagree

®Prof. NohmNohmz™ ID:017807 2008/01/20 16:25:56	Reply Edit post Homepage
For i find no pleasure in beauty these days. That's something that faded with age and experience for me. The only things that seem to bring me peace are large bodies of water, deserted desert, forests, and unspoiled medows. That and feeding.

Well I've got the forest and the water...

Gigazubyte ID:015441 2008/01/20 16:29:06	Reply Edit post Homepage
And arguably the meadows, although that only works if you lie down. Stand up and you see the barns. I like deserted stretches of beach, personally. I was a fox on one once. And he gave me this look like "You damn kids, get off my lawn! I came out here to get AWAY from you morons!"

heh. I've had encounters like that too. . .

®Prof. NohmNohmz™ ID:017807 2008/01/20 16:46:32

Reply Edit post Homepage

Though not a fox. A possum and a wolf, but i haven't seen foxes round here. Haven't gotten a good look at a Cyote either, but i know there's lots out here. The wolf came within a few feet of me in the night time. it sniffed me, and i didn't run or make any distressed sounds. It -grunted- in response to my "sup" and walked off. Encounters like that don't seem to put things in perspective, hard to tell what those creatures are feeling at the time. But one thing's certain, encounters like that have a pourful effect on the energy arround you, and your own for that matter. We're so used to interacting with other humans and not so much with wild animals, that our spirits aren't quite used to being imposed upon by those creatures. If you're sensitive enough you can sense the "disturbance in the force" from nearly 10 feet. it's like the chill that climbs your back when that sudden twinge of fear hits you, or that chalkboard gets scraped. . Wether you're afraid or not. The natural response to the chill is fear, but that can be de-programmed, since it had been programmed in anyhow. One can be alert to a cautious situation without being afraid. But the situation is only tense because the human condition isn't accustomed to it.

It should actually be comforting. . .

®Prof. NohmNohmz™ ID:017807 2008/01/20 16:50:54	Reply Edit post Homepage
to see nature in such a light. To know that you -can- coexist with it.

Re: I never understood that mode of behavior.

Kirby ID:017099 2008/01/20 15:42:53	Reply Edit post Homepage
I'm more of a visionary person myself... So I sometimes can understand why sight can be much more appealing than the other five senses when studying an object. Perspective is basic as you can get.

That seems as though you're taking your senses for granted.

®Prof. NohmNohmz™ ID:017807 2008/01/20 16:12:54

Reply Edit post Homepage

Cover your eyes with a handkerchief for a while. days if you can get away with it. Just listen, feel, smell, taste. Feel the chill that hits only moments before a summer rain. Listen to how the drops hiss when they reach the ground. you can almost visualize them in slow motion, seeing the perfectly round drops falling to the ground. After a while, you can feel a lightning strike seconds before you hear the thunder. And that's only one example. As for the whole seeing thing, I can understand how sight is important, due to symetry and asymetry, but tell me what's more important in the darkness? I've spent a lot of time in complete darkness. and Sight is useless there. In the darkness would you have a good looking meal, or one that tastes, smells, and nourishes you with unrivaled eficiency? And for that matter, what about a woman? would you be in the dark with someone who looks good but is rotten inside? or someone whos voice melts the all piercing darkness. . whos gentle but adamant grasp reassures you that they're with you into the depths of the abyss. . . The smell of her hair as it passes close to your cheek enough to feel the chill of the wind it blows and the softness that it yields behind that chill? Tell me, would you rather be loved or look at someone who's lovely?

I'm glad this isn't on the front page. . .

®Prof. NohmNohmz™ ID:017807 2008/01/20 16:22:16	Reply Edit post Homepage
I wouldn't want people to actually read this drek i'm typing.

Some do read the archives...

Gigazubyte ID:015441 2008/01/20 16:25:32	Reply Edit post Homepage
and this is the internet. As the saying goes, don't post anything you wouldn't want your mother seeing, because anybody can find it. And of course you would want the one who felt good. The real question is, would you want one that felt good, or one that WAS good? Is perception more important?

Feeling isn't quite the limit to what i was refering.

®Prof. NohmNohmz™ ID:017807 2008/01/20 16:30:34

Reply Edit post Homepage

You're taking a litteral approach to this. Purity of heart is top on my list. Purity of mind not so much. Purity of body, relative to other attributes. Feel stems to far more than just touch. The bud flowers into a few different heads. What i'm saying is Even if her face was burned by fire, or if her body was larger than some others, it wouldn't matter because anyone i'd let that close to me would -have- to quiet the demons that are my lulaby and morning alarm.

Beauty or not, my demons stand silent for none.

®Prof. NohmNohmz™ ID:017807 2008/01/20 16:31:34	Reply Edit post Homepage

Re: That seems as though you're taking your senses for granted.

Kirby ID:017099 2008/01/20 16:23:54

Reply Edit post Homepage

"Cover your eyes with a handkerchief for a while. days if you can get away with it." I've done that many times without being told. I actually agree with you for the most part. I'm not saying vision could be used primarily over other senses but we're more inclined to use vision for delightful purposes. Such as the food sample I told you earlier...visionaries find it more interesting to the eye than thinking about the other senses for a while. I regularly train all my senses to work on my behalf just in case of emergencies. It's too unrealistic for me to focus on one primary sense to live an active life. "Tell me, would you rather be loved or look at someone who's lovely?" I rather be loved. I don't peek at women just in case I implied I did. I'm too much of a gentleman in realistic terms.

A comonality we share. Though don't get me wrong. . .

®Prof. NohmNohmz™ ID:017807 2008/01/20 16:37:20

Reply Edit post Homepage

Disagreeing with my beliefs won't send me into a blind rage. . . humans are fundamentally different in both mind and spirit. To agree with every scrap i throw to the table would make me suspicious of your true intention. Don't feel as though i'm being an aggressor either. I mean nothing by my debating. It's simply a way to express my own ideals without being out of place. As well, debating (maybe dragging you into an endless cycle of disagreeing as Giga says) is all about being heard really. Anyone who is upset at not convincing their opposition of their point shouldn't grow angry with it. That in itself is pointless. The point isn't to convince the opposition unless you know their ideal is wrong. In this case, I don't know who's right or wrong. But the back and forth sheds more light on both sides.

Re: A comonality we share. Though don't get me wrong. . .

Kirby ID:017099 2008/01/20 16:50:50

Reply Edit post Homepage

"To agree with every scrap..." AM NOT! Anywho, I don't just agree with good points just for brownie points or to win a popular contest...it's to make my own points vivid and understanding to the opposition. Establishing a mutual connection within the argument is my key to getting my points across so I don't have to deal with the arguing points over and over in my perspective. I believe it'll make them think a lot more into my points if we see mutual progess. Not saying I do it for every argument but for the more stubborn/hard-to-kill debates. It's basically using a rapport rhetorical strategy though. It'd be silly and unrealistic for someone to agree with every point causing a contradiction to their own points.

Re: I love boobs

sonic loves amy ID:014992 2008/01/20 05:12:46	Reply Edit post Homepage
So, I come in here to check on how things are, and this is what greets me.. ~_~

I think most males have a fondness for supple breasts

®Prof. NohmNohmz™ ID:017807 2008/01/20 11:27:59

Reply Edit post Homepage

However, this is a CoEd forum, and I'm certain that many females would be quite offended by such statements. I could get away with talking about boobs because I'm an equal oppurtunity flamer. I'd talk about dorks as much as I would about jugs. And beside the point, if you're going to make lude posts, at least make them entertaining man. . . I know they're one of god's greater creations, those jiggly wiggly buzzooms, but you have to remember that talking about Tah tah's will put you in the doghouse. But yes. . . Tater tots are great.

CHAO BBS To view new posts, use the R Trigger to display the menu, then select "Reload."